On Being Original, Official, Theology Girl, and the Original and Official Theology Girl
October 11, 2008

Okay, here’s an odd one for you.  (You’ll have to stick with me for a while and unfortunately the story involves Josh Groban--WHY CAN I NEVER BE FREE OF YOU CHERUBIC MAN BOY--but I have a strange tale to tell.)

I mentioned a few posts back that there is a new “Theology Girl” site (or sites, really, because there is now also a Yahoo group and a “Theology Girls” web site.) Well, after I wrote that post, I wrote a second post wherein I commented how I had noticed that the new site was claiming to be the “original and official” Theology Girl since 1994.  On both posts I noted how we had in common the (unfortunate) bond that is the Groban.  Tonight I was reflecting on these sites, where “Reformed Bloggers” write and I thought, “Huh, Reformed Bloggers, that rings a bell . . .”

I then remembered that on the Josh Groban fan club site, someone had posted a link to my blog where I wrote that he should not sing in French and this whole big thing went down where I was virtually tarred and feathered for hating France or some such nonsense.  Do you remember that?  I even posted about it gave a shout out to all my Reformed supporters. 

I went back to my private messages, because the person who had posted the link to my blog had written to me because I asked her how she came to find it in the first place.  This member, “jacyjoypals,” wrote almost exactly a year ago (and I cut and paste directly from my private message inbox):

“Just a note to say I loved your blog entry and posts here and welcome to the group of boycotted FOJG [Friends of Josh Groban] fans to which I am a solid member. You’re great and I love that you stand strong on your own person and opinions and that is what we also like about Josh! Have a great great [sic]!

:D !”

Hmmmm.  “Jacyjoypals.” It clicked.  The new “Theology Girl” sites are part of the “JoyPal” network, a network of Reformed Bloggers.  I had messaged her again about reading my blog and she sent this reply (html links removed, though I included the links the first time I quoted from her message):